HUMAN RIGHTS COUNCIL ADOPTS OUTCOMES OF UNIVERSAL PERIODIC REVIEW ON AZERBAIJAN, NIGERIA, MEXICO AND MAURITIUS
The Human Rights Council this afternoon adopted the outcomes of the Universal Periodic Review on Azerbaijan, Nigeria, Mexico and Mauritius.
Khalaf Khalafov, Deputy Minister for Foreign Affairs of Azerbaijan, said that Azerbaijan had paid significant attention to the Universal Periodic Review mechanism. In the preparation of additional comments, representatives of various ministries and institutions had been consulted, including the Ombudsman’s Office and actors of civil society. On 18 March 2009, significant constitutional reforms for the promotion and protection of human rights had been implemented. As a result of amendments to the Constitution, the provisions on the prohibition of unlawful interference in private and family life, on equality, the rights of children, the right to freedom of religion, and the right to obtain information had been enhanced. Azerbaijan had also accepted the recommendations with regard to further measures on the prevention of all forms of violence against women.
In the discussion on Azerbaijan, speakers noted that Azerbaijan had taken many positive steps in a number of areas, including the fight against poverty, education and gender equality. The results of such practical measures and Azerbaijan’s approach to the Universal Periodic Review had created all the prerequisites required for a positive development in the human rights area. It was also encouraging to note that Azerbaijan had accepted the majority of the recommendations made during their review. Speakers also commented on the situation of migrants in Azerbaijan; violence against women; and the protection of human rights defenders.
The following delegations took the floor on the outcome on Azerbaijan: United Arab Emirates, Qatar, Algeria, Uzbekistan, Pakistan, Russian Federation, Saudi Arabia, Egypt, China and Bahrain. The following non-governmental organizations spoke on Azerbaijan: National Commission on Human Rights of Azerbaijan, Human Rights Watch, Cercle de Recherche sur les Droits et les Devoirs de la Personne Humaine, Federation for Women and Family Planning and Al-Hakim Foundation.
E.E. Onobu, Under Secretary of Foreign Affairs of Nigeria, said that Nigeria had engaged in the Universal Periodic Review with utmost openness. It had been a very inspiring and enriching experience. Nigeria reaffirmed its commitment to human rights for all Nigerians. At the outset, Nigeria wanted to underline that it had accepted 30 of the 32 recommendations that had been made. Several bills were underway, including a bill on the freedom of information or the police act. Nigeria affirmed that a substantial number of recommendations were already being enacted. Nigeria had made efforts to strengthen the national poverty eradication programme, with an emphasis on the rural areas. A national committee had been set up to review the death penalty.
On Nigeria, speakers acknowledged that Nigeria was able to make great strides at the legal and institutional levels in order to provide additional protection and promotion for human rights, and these efforts were noteworthy. The number of recommendations that Nigeria had accepted was welcomed. Speakers understood the many challenges Nigeria faced in their implementation and called for assistance from the international community. Speakers also raised issues regarding hate crime against homosexuals; overcrowding of prisons; extrajudicial killings and torture; abolition of the death penalty; and access to justice.
The following delegations spoke during the discussion on Nigeria: Pakistan, Venezuela, Qatar, Belarus, China, Algeria, Egypt, Saudi Arabia, Kazakhstan, Bahrain, United States and Senegal. The following non-governmental organizations also took the floor on Nigeria: Amnesty International, Canadian HIV/AIDS Legal Network, Conectas Human Rights, Cercle de Recherche sur les Droits el les Devoirs de la Personne Humaine, Interfaith International, Islamic Human Rights Commission, International Human Rights Association of American Minorities; Arab Commission for Human Rights and Islamic Human Rights Commission.
Jose Guevara, Chief of the Unit of Human Rights at the Ministry of Interior of Mexico, said Mexico was taking part in the Human Rights Council Universal Periodic Review on Mexico with a firm commitment to take up issues of human rights. Mexico was a country currently undergoing reforms to become a democratic society. Mexico had accepted a total of 83 out of the 91 recommendations made by the Working Group. Most of the recommendations were related to five subjects, including the administration of justice and security, the rights of women and indigenous people, freedom of expression, and the harmonization of legislation with the provisions of international human rights instruments.
During the discussion on Mexico, speakers appreciated the attention given by Mexico to the issue of the rights of migrant workers and persons with disabilities, whereas the abolishment of the Special Prosecutor’s Office for Political Movements was regretted. The issue of impunity was also discussed. Speakers acknowledged with appreciation Mexico’s efforts, in spite its challenges, to advance the promotion and protection of human rights. Speakers commented on the lack of measures to fight violence against women; corruption; violence of military forces; sexual education in schools; and reforms criminalizing abortion.
The following countries took the floor on Mexico: Algeria, Egypt, United States, Belgium and Chad. The following organizations also took the floor: National Commission on Human Rights of Mexico, Amnesty International, Human Rights Watch, Action Canada for Population and Development, International Commission of Jurists, Federation for Women and Family Planning, Groupo de Informacion en Reproduccion Elegida, Conectas Human Rights, Centro de Derechos Humanos Miguel Augustin Pro Juarez, Social Service Agency of the Protestant Church in Germany, Centre for Reproductive Rights and Arab Commission of Human Rights.
Shree Baboo Chekitan Servansing, Permanent Representative of Mauritius to the United Nations Office at Geneva, said that Mauritius had always upheld the highest standards of human rights and remained committed to continue to do so. He reiterated that the promotion and protection of human rights, be it at the international, regional or national level, was a priority for Mauritius. In addition to the human rights enshrined in the Constitution, a series of measures had been adopted and they ensured that citizens of Mauritius, irrespective of their race, place of origin, political opinions, colour, creed or sex, were able to exercise effectively their civil, political, economic, social and cultural rights.
On Mauritius, speakers said that Mauritius had demonstrated its commitment to work in favour of a true human rights culture, particularly through the completion of the national plan of action for human rights, the purpose of which was in particular to consolidate the human rights of vulnerable groups. Speakers commended the openness, transparency and commitment with which the Government of Mauritius engaged in the review process. Speakers noted that the Government of Mauritius had accepted almost all the recommendations made to it during the interactive dialogue in February this year including the call for efforts to be intensified in the attainment of the full enjoyment of civil and political rights as well as economic, social and cultural rights for its population.
The following delegations spoke on Mauritius: Algeria, Pakistan, Morocco, United States, Canada, India, Maldives, Chad, Botswana, Nigeria, Senegal and New Zealand. The non-governmental organizations European Region of the International Lesbian and Gay Association and the Arab Commission of Human Rights also spoke.
The Council will meet at 10 a.m. on Friday, 12 June to consider the outcome of the Universal Periodic Review on Jordan and Malaysia. This will be followed by a general debate on its agenda item on the Universal Periodic Review.
Consideration of Outcome of Universal Periodic Review on Azerbaijan
KHALAF KHALAFOV, Deputy Minister for Foreign Affairs of Azerbaijan, said that Azerbaijan had paid significant attention to the Universal Periodic Review mechanism. In the preparation of additional comments, representatives of various ministries and institutions had been consulted, including the Ombudsman’s Office and actors of civil society. On 18 March 2009, significant constitutional reforms for the promotion and protection of human rights had been implemented. Those reforms were directed towards strengthening the social focus of the State, enhancing the effectiveness of human rights and fundamental freedoms, and improving the work of the supreme State authorities, as well as courts and municipalities. As a result of amendments to the Constitution, the provisions on the prohibition of unlawful interference in private and family life, on equality, the rights of children, the right to freedom of religion, and the right to obtain information had been enhanced. With a view to improving the normative legal basis and institutional mechanisms, measures had also been taken to increase transparency in the work of governmental bodies and municipalities, with the adoption of a national strategy on increased transparency and the fight against corruption established through a presidential decree and stipulated in the national plan for 2007-2011.
Azerbaijan had also accepted the recommendations with regard to further measures on the prevention of all forms of violence against women. In that context, the Government had implemented measures of a social and economic character into national legislation with a view to eliminating all forms of violence against women. For instance, the definition of sexual discrimination was enhanced in the law on gender equality adopted in 2006, which was now extended to include “any demonstrations of differentiation and superiority for reasons of sex that limited or impeded equal application of rights”. Further, the draft law on the elimination of domestic violence was currently under review in the Milli Majlis (Parliament), and it called for a legal framework on violence and contained provisions on the establishment of rehabilitation centres for women and children who were victims of violence. Moreover, Azerbaijan also accepted the recommendations concerning the necessity of taking further steps towards the prohibition of corporal punishment and cruel treatment of children, as well as on the enhancement of educational programmes and measures on social integration for street children that were victims of sexual exploitation and physical violence, Mr. Khalafov said.
SAEED AL HABSI (United Arab Emirates) said Azerbaijan attached importance to human rights and had taken steps to harmonise its legislation with international norms to protect human rights, a primary matter of concern for any modern State. Azerbaijan had also taken steps to combat poverty and was providing work for its citizens and protecting women and children. It had taken striking efforts to achieve sustainable development within the country. The Council should adopt the report.
MANSOOR ABDULLA AL-SULAITIN (Qatar) said that Qatar commended the openness and constructive attitude of Azerbaijan. Qatar commended the efforts made by Azerbaijan to strengthen human rights, especially those to strengthen the legal structure which was established to protect human rights. Azerbaijan’s economy had been marked by growth during the last years and the Government would now meet the remaining challenges, especially those regarding children and displaced persons.
SELMA MALIKA HENDEL (Algeria) commended the spirit of cooperation of Azerbaijan in the framework of its Universal Periodic Review. Azerbaijan had in fact accepted 80 per cent of the recommendations received. Algeria expressed appreciation for Azerbaijan’s transparency and cooperation with the different human rights mechanisms as well as their constructive role in the Human Rights Council. Algeria also commended Azerbaijan’s efforts in the field of promoting and protecting human rights, especially economic and social rights by implementing policies aimed at alleviating poverty and increasing employment, in line with the recommendation made by Algeria. Algeria noted with satisfaction the measures adopted by the Government of Azerbaijan to tackle the problem of violence against women, including domestic violence as recommended by the Algerian delegation, and encouraged Azerbaijan to take further steps in this regard.
FARHOD ARZIEV (Uzbekistan) said the information presented and the detailed comments on the recommendations were most helpful. Uzbekistan applauded the constructive approach shown by the Azerbaijani Government to the Universal Periodic Review process and the consistent steps taken in the area of upholding human rights and fundamental freedoms both in the framework of international obligations and in national legislation. The results of practical measures towards improving human rights and the approach to the Universal Periodic Review had created all the prerequisites required for a positive situation. The Government's commitment to its national and international obligations would promote a continuation of efforts to enhance and strengthen the system for protection and promotion of human rights in the country.
MARGHOOB SALEEM BUTT (Pakistan) said that Azerbaijan was a founding member of this Council which had actively and constructively participated in the institution building phase of the Council. Azerbaijan had approached its Universal Periodic Review in an open and constructive manner and had provided frank responses to the queries raised from the floor by Member States. It was also encouraging to note that Azerbaijan had accepted the majority of the recommendations made during their review, which again spoke of their constructive attitude in dealing with the subject of the promotion and protection of human rights. Pakistan applauded the steps taken by the Government of Azerbaijan to continue to promote and protect human rights, including the follow-up on many recommendations made during their review through establishment of a Working Group.
PAVEL CHERNIKOV (Russian Federation) congratulated the delegation of Azerbaijan on their successful review by the Universal Periodic Review held in February. The Russian Federation thanked Azerbaijan for the further detailed information presented today. The Azerbaijan review fully met the requirements as set out in resolution 60/251 of the United Nations General Assembly, and also set out in the institutional building package of the Human Rights Council adopted at the fifth session of the Council. This result was significantly assisted by the serious and constructive attitudes shown by the delegation throughout all the stages of the review. High-level participation in the Universal Periodic Review acted as further evidence of the active stance taken by Azerbaijan in the field of human rights. The Russian Federation hoped that Azerbaijan would not lower its vigilance to implement all the obligations undertaken as a result of the Universal Periodic Review.
KHALID MOHAMMAD KARAKUTLY (Saudi Arabia) said the presentation of Azerbaijan made clear the country's position with regards to the recommendations made at the Working Group of the Universal Periodic Review. Their views reflected a positive and effective approach to the machinery of the Human Rights Council. Azerbaijan's cooperation with all procedures and mechanisms operating within the United Nations system and its determination to continue to do so and participate in the human rights dialogue reflected the importance it gave to human rights. Azerbaijan was determined to ensure and promote the economic, social and cultural rights and civil and political rights of all its citizens. The efforts made were commended, and should continue.
AMR ROSHDY HASSAN (Egypt) said that Egypt commended the efforts that Azerbaijan had made and the improvements that it had achieved in the fight against poverty. Egypt also commended Azerbaijan on its steps taken to reach gender equality. Egypt firmly believed that Azerbaijan would implement the recommendations that had been made during the Universal Periodic Review and therefore, Egypt recommended the adoption of the report.
KE YOUSHENG (China) said that last February a high-level delegation from Azerbaijan attended the Universal Periodic Review and engaged in the dialogue in a sincere and open way. The successful constitutional reform that took place last month in Azerbaijan was a major step forward in reforming the rule of law, rights of the child and the rights of migrants. China welcomed the newly adopted law on the rights of migrants which contained a single definition of migrants and would assist in facilitating the implementation of measures that would benefit migrants. China was informed that a national action programme was being developed and put in place, which was welcomed. China believed that a serious implementation of the national programme of action, and the recommendations made during the Universal Periodic Review process would make possible the necessary reforms to ensure rights to the people of Azerbaijan.
MUNA ABBAS RADHI (Bahrain) said Azerbaijan had taken positive steps to implement a number of recommendations contained in the Universal Periodic Review report. The efforts made with a view to promoting the enjoyment of rights and freedoms were noted, and the efforts to promote equal rights between men and women and to promote policies and programmes to ensure education that met the needs of society were also welcomed. Efforts were also being made with respect to the rights of refugees and internally displaced persons and their enjoyment of economic, social and cultural rights.
AYDIN SAFIKHANLI, of Commission for Human Rights of Azerbaijan, said that several normative legal acts and state programmes were adopted by Azerbaijan concerning women’s rights and gender equality and the fight against violence. Moreover, these issues were always the focus of attention of the Ombudsman. The Commission considered it necessary to establish crisis centers for women and children exposed to violence, aid centers for children deprived of parental care and to adopt a law on domestic violence. In also noted that Azerbaijan was a multinational and poly-confessional state that supported the principles of unity and diversity and where persons belonging to different religions did not face discrimination.
JULIE DE RIVERO, of Human Rights Watch, said that Human Rights Watch welcomed the commitment by Azerbaijan to issue a standing invitation to all special procedures. The Universal Periodic Review process on Azerbaijan brought a spotlight on a number of core areas of concern that had also been the focus of Human Rights Watch’s own work on Azerbaijan, and that had been raised with the authorities as part of Human Rights Watch’s engagement with the Government. Harassment and intimidation of human rights defenders, violations of freedom of assembly, politically motivated arrests and prosecutions, and torture and ill-treatment in police custody, were among them.
BELL HILAIRE, of Cercle de recherche sur les droits et les devoirs de la personne humaine, said the reforms undertaken by the country in the field of human rights were appreciated. The World Bank had recognised these efforts, listing Azerbaijan first in the list of countries having made considerable reforms in 2008. Azerbaijan should continue along this path despite the recurring Nagorno-Karabakh conflict. It should not stop its cooperation with the Council and its work therein.
WANDA NOWICKA, of Federation for Women and Family Planning, said that it was important to address sexual harassment as a serious issue affecting thousands of women in Azerbaijan. The organization called on the Government to conduct research to assess the situation of sexual harassment in Azerbaijan’s society and to plan accordingly; to conduct public awareness campaigns to address the issue of sexual harassment and the existing legal framework; and to implement the appropriate mechanisms for women to be able to report rape cases, including training and sensitivity among law enforcement personnel, women police stations, and strong measures against corruption.
ABDUL AMIER HASHOM, of Al-Hakim Foundation, in a joint statement with the Interfaith Foundation, said that Azerbaijan’s commitment to respect the recommendations made by the Universal Periodic Review was welcomed. The organizations encouraged the Government of Azerbaijan to continue to strengthen its institutional framework, and to establish a culture of human rights in the country. Of particular importance were measures to be taken to combat violence against women and children and the establishment of access to justice. The organizations encouraged the Government of Azerbaijan to adopt a national plan to combat trafficking in persons, and to provide all necessary assistance for victims.
KHALAF KHALAFOV, Deputy Minister for Foreign Affairs of Azerbaijan, said he had been totally satisfied with the dialogue, and very much valued the statements that were made in connection with the recommendations by the Council, and valued the contributions made by all countries in their recommendations and in their support of Azerbaijan which was moving forward in solving issues related to the protection of human rights. All countries that had participated in the debate as well as non-governmental organizations (NGOs) were thanked. The Government of Azerbaijan would continue to support the Universal Periodic Review procedure and would be just as open in its cooperation with all Governments and NGOs. The recommendations that were mentioned in the statements would be taken into account as well and should work as a further way of stimulating the protection of human rights in Azerbaijan. Recommendations relating to the question of improving the gender programme would be given great attention by the Government, as would those on the rights of the child and strengthening the position of women in Azerbaijani society. The social situation of refugees and displaced persons would also garner enhanced attention. Human rights were the greatest universal achievement of the world community, and Azerbaijan would remain faithful to this, continuing its cooperation with the international community and the United Nations.
The Council then adopted the outcome of the Universal Periodic Review on Azerbaijan.
Consideration of Outcome of Universal Periodic Review on Nigeria
Nigeria had made efforts to strengthen the national poverty eradication programme, with an emphasis on the rural areas. A national Committee had been set up to review the death penalty. The Universal Periodic Review had the potential to become a very effective tool in the enhancement of human rights, both on a national and international level. Nigeria was committed to honour all its commitments made during the Universal Periodic Review and had therefore asked the High Commissioner for Human Rights for assistance.
MARGHOOB SALEEM BUTT (Pakistan) said that the detailed responses presented to the recommendations made during the Working Group’s proceedings indicated the seriousness of the Nigerian Government on the issues contained in this report. The frank and honest dialogue was the hallmark of the Nigerian delegation. Nigeria’s commitment to the promotion and protection of human rights was explicit both by the steps taken at home and the active role played by their delegation in Geneva, including the able leadership provided through the Council Presidency. The recent re-election of Nigeria to the Council bore testimony of this fact. Pakistan commended the Government of Nigeria for its determination to institutionalize and enhance the enjoyment of human rights and fundamental freedoms for all its citizens. In this regard Pakistan took particular note of Nigeria’s recent ratification of the Optional Protocol to the Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities.
GERMAN MUNDARAIN HERNANDEZ (Venezuela) said the Nigerian Government had given a clear demonstration of its commitment to the protection and promotion of human rights through its cooperation with the Universal Periodic Review and the formulation of its national report, the consultations on which involved all stakeholders. The spirit of openness and the constructive approach taken to facilitate the flow of information were welcome, as specific and exact answers had been provided to questions raised, in particular with regards to the situation of the latest educational plans. Nigeria had undertaken an important and valuable effort to further protect and promote human rights and had clear objectives, something which was highly valued.
MANSOOR ABDULLA AL-SULAITIN (Qatar) said that Qatar highly appreciated the responses to the questions asked during the Universal Periodic Review. Qatar commended Nigeria on the steps it had undertaken to combat human trafficking and corruption to achieve economic development. This reflected its commitment to the Universal Periodic Review, despite the major challenges it faced. Qatar called on the international community to provide Nigeria with the necessary means to implement those recommendations. Qatar wished Nigeria and its people much success in its efforts.
YEVGENY LAZAREV (Belarus) noted with satisfaction the high level of constructiveness and the responsible way in which Nigeria approached the Universal Periodic Review process. Belarus made a number of recommendations aimed at promoting human rights in a number of important categories. In this context, combating violence against women and children, ensuring primary and secondary education and fostering and strengthening a national health care system were among them. Belarus welcomed the fact that Nigeria expressed willingness to comply with those recommendations, as well as implement measures to establish a national approach to strengthening the system of human rights.
ZHOU XIANFENG (China) said Nigeria had adopted a flexible and open posture to present its achievements in human rights, and had also spoken clearly about challenges, engaging in a constructive dialogue with Member States of the Council. Nigeria had implemented the recommendations it had accepted. Further progress should be made on judicial independence and achieving the Millennium Development Goals. Nigeria should continue to overcome challenges and achieve full protection of human rights - the international community should show full understanding of the difficult situation facing Nigeria, a multi-ethnic and multi-religious country, as well as the efforts it was already making in the field of human rights.
SELMA MALIKA HENDEL (Algeria) said that Algeria commended the efforts made in Nigeria to promote women’s rights and to fight discrimination that could affect them. Algeria was encouraged by the acceptance of a recommendation put to Nigeria by Algeria concerning Nigeria’s accession to the Convention on the Elimination of Discrimination against Women. The active and constructive role that Nigeria played in the Council was also commended. The skillful chairmanship of the President of the Human Rights Council contributed to the success of the Council. Nigeria’s commitment to improvements in the field of education, health and reduction of poverty proved Nigeria’s will to pursue the implementation of the recommendations of the Universal Periodic Review Working Group.
AMR ROSHDY HASSAN (Egypt) said that the Universal Periodic Review of Nigeria had indicated the important advances it had achieved towards the attainment of the Millennium Development Goals as well as the priority given by Nigeria to the promotion and protection of human rights. It was noteworthy to mention in addition the national action plan as well as the seven point agenda defining the Nigerian Government’s priorities in several areas, including the development of human capital, food security, functional education and the rule of law. Egypt welcomed the existing cooperation between Nigeria and the Office of the High Commissioner for Human Rights as well as the international human rights instruments and treaty bodies. Egypt was confident that Nigeria would continue to pursue its efforts towards the implementation of its national programmes and strategies furthering the protection of human rights on the ground.
AHMED SULEIMAN IBRAHIM ALAQUIL (Saudi Arabia) said the delegation of Nigeria was thanked for the statement delivered with regards to the Universal Periodic Review, and the information provided showed that Nigeria was keen to benefit from the process, as well as that country's voluntary commitments to the recommendations in the report. The Universal Periodic Review was an opportunity for widespread national consultations on human rights. Nigeria was able to make great strides at the legal and institutional levels in order to provide additional protection and promotion for human rights, and these efforts were noteworthy.
ABZAL SAPARBEKULY (Kazakhstan) said that Nigeria had demonstrated the importance of the Universal Periodic Review process to them by conducting a broad consultation and by the high-level of participation in preparing the national report. During the interactive dialogue, Kazakhstan had learned about the challenges of this multi-ethnic and multi-religious country, for example to preserve social coherence and accord, problems of children, women and other vulnerable groups, and difficulties in the field of education and health. At the same time, Kazakhstan had learned about the commitment and plans of the Government to address those challenges. Kazakhstan was sure that while accepting most recommendations, the Government of Nigeria had already started to elaborate the necessary steps for their implementation.
BUDOOR SALAH ABDULAZIZ (Bahrain) said that the effort made by Nigeria to implement recommendations issued under the Universal Periodic Review was commendable. Bahrain welcomed the commitment Nigeria made not only nationally but also internationally in the field of human rights. The re-election of Nigeria to the Human Rights Council was further evidence of the importance the Nigerian Government attached to the promotion and protection of human rights and fundamental freedoms. Bahrain highlighted that the measures taken to combat trafficking in human beings was also commendable. Nigeria worked tireless to implement all measures at the national level to promote and protect human rights, and therefore Bahrain supported the adoption of this report.
ANNA CHAMBERS (United States) said Nigeria's efforts to strengthen Governmental protection for human rights were welcomed. Torture and abuse of detainees by security forces, lengthy pre-trial detention and poor prison conditions were a problem. Nigeria should make efforts to end impunity and improve these issues. The recent creation of a Ministry for the Niger Delta was noted, and it was hoped it had sufficient capacity and Government support to address the issues of violent crime in the region, and to undertake consultations with minority groups.
ABDOUL WAHAB HAIDARA (Senegal) said that Senegal commended the continuing efforts made by Nigeria. Nigeria would now continue improving the human rights situation. The implementation of the recommendations would be an opportunity to note further progress. The implementation of the recommendations made during the Universal Periodic Review would be all the easier if Nigeria could benefit from assistance from the international community.
MARIANNE LILLIEBJERG, of Amnesty International, said that Amnesty International welcomed the statement in the Working Group by the Minister of Foreign Affairs that Nigeria “continued to exercise a self-imposed moratorium (on the death penalty)”. However, Amnesty International was concerned by recent legislative amendments in several states in Nigeria to extend the scope of the death penalty to include crimes related to kidnapping. Amnesty International called on the Government to accept and implement as many of the Universal Periodic Review recommendations as possible and as a matter of urgency, in particular, among others, to repeal all laws that discriminated against women, to prohibit all forms of violence against women and to fully implement the provisions of the Convention on the Elimination of All Forms of Discrimination against Women in both federal and state legislation.
ROWLAND JIDE MACAULAY, of Canadian HIV/AIDS Legal Network, said the reality was that homosexuality was illegal under federal law in Nigeria, and due to widespread taboos and homophobia, very few people were open about their sexual orientation and sexual identity. There had been numerous cases of harassment and publications in the media inciting and promoting hatred against sexual minorities. The Government should repeal criminal provisions against consensual same-sex conduct, and ensure that the human rights of lesbian, gay, bisexual and transgender individuals and human rights defenders were not violated. Nigeria should reject any attempt to create discriminatory new laws and eliminate all existing legislation that discriminated based on sexual orientation and gender identity.
LUCIA NADER, of Conectas Human Rights, said that it remained concerned that the Government of Nigeria did not institute a broad-based and participative human rights framework that guaranteed the fundamental rights of its citizens. Despite the Government claims that the question was not one of will, but of growing capacity, the organization believed that Nigeria had failed in implementing many reforms that did not require significant financial resources or additional capacity. Nigeria had yet to ratify the Optional Protocols to the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights and to the Convention on the Rights of the Child.
BELL HILAIRE, of Cercle de recherche sur les droits et les devoirs de la personne humaine, said the commitments undertaken by Nigeria during its Universal Periodic Review of the Human Rights Council had been noted. Exercising human rights in Nigeria was hindered by the many challenges faced. In this context, Cercle de Recherche sur les Droits et les Devoirs de la Personne Humaine was particularly concerned over the inter-religious violence in the country, but was confident that there would be a successful outcome to the recommendations made, above all by promoting moderation and tolerance which would promote peace and harmony among all peoples.
Mr. BIRO DIAWARA, of Interfaith International in a joint statement with Al-Hakim Foundation, said Nigeria was to be congratulated on the reforms undertaken in human rights since the fall of the authoritarian military regime. Nigeria was culturally and ethnically rich. The acceptance of 30 recommendations in the report by the Universal Periodic Review Working Group had to be given effect through the adoption of political and legislative measures by the Government. Regarding recommendations on economic, social and cultural rights, the announcement made by Shell to provide a big settlement to avoid a trial for the assassination of an activist was noted - the Government should take firm measures to follow this case and rehabilitate the victims in the relevant ethnic minority. The Government should establish a national framework for dialogue to enable the development of a Code of Conduct and Ethics for transnational corporations operating on Nigerian territory. It should also foster inter-cultural and inter-religious dialogue to combat religious intolerance against women and inter-community violence.
DAMIEN PERCY, of International Human Rights Association of American Minorities, said that there were several areas where progress was needed in Nigeria. It was critical for the Ombudsman for Human Rights to be free and impartial which was not yet the case. The organization urged the Government to end as soon as possible the practice of the death penalty. Evidence suggested that not all prisoners were granted a fair trial and that prisoners could not appeal their sentence. It was also essential that access to justice should be granted to all people. The organization was concerned that extrajudicial killings and torture were still carried out.
ABDEL WAHAB HANI, of Arab Commission for Human Rights, welcomed Nigeria’s accession to international human rights instruments and in particular the ratification of the conventions on migrants, torture and the prevention of genocide. Nigeria was encouraged to implement a number of other recommendations, namely on preventative measures; that social and economic rights be asserted as individual rights; and the effective enjoyment of economic and social rights in order to effectively combat torture. The Arab Commission for Human Rights believed that special attention should be paid to the follow up on measures taken, and that there should be a review of the undertaking made by the Government with the participation of civil society.
ANEESA SATTAR SILAL, of Islamic Human Rights Commission, said the organization remained saddened about the right to fair trial and due process in Nigeria - the Government was not only in breach of its international human rights obligations, but the policies of the Government were not compatible with the standards of fairness and due process defined by Sharia law and the Constitution. Many trials in Sharia courts failed to conform to international standards of fairness and did not respect due process as defined by Sharia legislation. The Government should launch a transparent, comprehensive and impartial inquiry, and uphold the principle of fair trial which should not contravene Nigeria's international obligations to guarantee individuals the right to equality before the law.
E.E. ONOBU, Under-Secretary for Foreign Affairs of Nigeria, said that Nigeria’s commitment to the promotion and protection of human rights was irreversible. Nigeria commended all delegations for their support during the Universal Periodic Review process. It was a fruitful process for Nigeria and it looked forward to the next Universal Periodic Review in four years. Nigeria thanked the Human Rights Council for its continuous support.
The Council then adopted the outcome of the Universal Periodic Review on Nigeria.
Consideration of Outcome of Universal Periodic Review on Mexico
JOSE GUEVARA, Chief of the Unit of Human Rights at the Ministry of Interior of Mexico, said Mexico was taking part in the Human Rights Council Universal Periodic Review on Mexico with a firm commitment to take up issues of human rights. Mexico was a country currently undergoing reforms to become a democratic society. Decisive measures had been taken by the Government of Mexico to combat impunity and strengthen institutional reforms. Mexico had accepted a total of 83 out of the 91 recommendations made by the Working Group. Most of the recommendations were related to five subjects, including the administration of justice and security, the rights of women and indigenous people, freedom of expression, and the harmonization of legislation with the provisions of international human rights instruments. Mexico made comments on the findings of the Working Group with respect to the recommendations that were not accepted. Since the meeting of the Working Group in February, relevant progress made by Mexico in the last few months included the adoption last April of an initiative for constitutional reform which was to be presented to parliament in September 2009, and would fully recognize the human rights contained in the international instruments which Mexico was party to. There had also been reforms to the criminal code which were analyzed by the Senate, and they considered offences against journalists as federal offences. New laws had been enacted which strengthened certification, and controlled the police force and the public prosecutors office in order to combat impunity.
In order to provide a comprehensive plan to violence against women, a gender perspective was taken into account, said Mr. Guevara. Important steps had been taken to prevent the violation of the rights of migrants. The Government of Mexico recently took a loan of several million dollars from the World Bank to break the circle of poverty and provide food, health care and housing to its citizens. In the area of health, there was a national strategy launched to reduce maternal mortality. The H1N1 pandemic had also been responded to in a comprehensive manner with a human rights perspective in order to ensure that there was no discrimination. The civil legal system prevailed over the military system. Legal steps had been taken against responsible military persons and reparations had been provided to victims. Furthermore, the 2008-2012 national plan set out the commitment to establish reforms in the military justice system in the context of the international commitments undertaken by Mexico. Mexico reasserted its commitment to the promotion and protection of human rights and pledged to draw on the efforts from all stakeholders to do so. Mexico would continue to engage members of civil society and the national human rights commission in its endeavour to implement the recommendations received.
AHMED SAADI (Algeria) said a great many recommendations were made to Mexico, particularly with regards to the fight against domestic violence, access to education, and others. Algeria was pleased that these had been accepted, in particular the entry into force of reforms to the Education Act and the adoption of a national plan for the indigenous. Initiatives with respect to the rights of migrants should continue, as should the efforts to ensure awareness of the Convention on the Rights of Migrant Workers and members of Their Families.
HEBA MOSTAFA RIZK (Egypt) said that Egypt thanked the delegation of Mexico for the clear presentation before the Council and the open spirit exercised by Mexico in conducting its review process, including in the interactive dialogue with the members of the Working Group. Egypt appreciated the attention given by Mexico to the issue of the rights of migrant workers and persons with disabilities. Egypt was confident that Mexico would exert all efforts to follow-up on the implementation of the recommendations it had accepted during its review process, in line with its national priorities and objectives.
ANNA CHAMBERS (United States) appreciated Mexico’s frank appraisal of the challenges facing the Government to overcome poverty, social discrimination, gender inequality, corruption, impunity and extreme violence. The United States also acknowledged with appreciation Mexico’s efforts, in spite of these challenges, to advance the promotion and protection of human rights. The United States supported recommendations in the Working Group report for Mexico to bolster the Office of the Federal Special Prosecutor, as well as State and local efforts to prevent, investigate, prosecute and punish cases of violence against women and of human trafficking. Additionally, the United States supported the recommendation to foster a safe environment for the freedom of expression, particularly for journalists, through strengthening investigations and legal frameworks.
LIESBETH GOOSSENS (Belgium) said in its report to the Universal Periodic Review, Mexico had described impunity as a threat to human rights, and this was agreed with - it was a major obstacle not only for human rights but for the rule of law's smooth functioning. The Government of Mexico was confronting organised crime. Another element in fighting impunity was to investigate and prosecute those who committed human rights violations. The abolition of the Special Prosecutor's Office for Political Movements was regretted, as it had been of great use in investigating the homicides and disappearances during the 1960s and 1970s. Mexico should establish a separate mechanism to allow the victims of the "Dirty Wars" to come to terms with the past. Not to do so would send a bad message to the perpetrators. The past was a part of the present. Mexico had a lot to do in the fight against violence against women, and the Government had adopted measures in regards to this. The real will demonstrated by the Government leading to strategy and practical actions was the only thing that would lead to results.
ANGUI AWADA (Chad) thanked the delegation of Mexico for the presentation of its report. Chad noted with satisfaction that Mexico had accepted the majority of the recommendations made to it during its Universal Periodic Review in February. Chad recommended the adoption of the outcome on Chad.
XAVERI MOCTEZUMA, of National Commission on Human Rights of Mexico, said that one of the objectives of human rights institutions was to cooperate closely with the United Nations to foster fundamental rights. The National Commission on Human Rights of Mexico was confident that the recommendations put forth by the Working Group would be followed up at the national level, with the input of civil society and national institutions. Of particular interest and concern was the fact that the human rights of persons with disabilities and the right to a healthy environment had not been addressed adequately, and thus the National Commission on Human Rights of Mexico called on the Human Rights Council to include this dimension into future Universal Periodic Reviews of all countries.
MARIANNE LILLIEBJERG, of Amnesty International, said successive Mexican Governments had made similar commitments as those made at the Universal Periodic Review process to address longstanding human rights concerns without delivering effective results. Examples included pledges to eradicate the use of torture in the criminal justice system and to end impunity for past human rights violations. There were some welcome legislative advances with regards to violence against women, but most authorities in the country had not taken measures to effectively implement these legal obligations, and many victims and relatives continued to face obstacles in filing complaints and receiving prompt and effective redress. Cases in Ciudad Juarez and Chihuahua City should be addressed with urgency.
JULIE DE RIVERO, of Human Rights Watch, said that grave human rights violations were being committed by the armed forces in Mexico. Since military forces took part in the fight against drug trafficking, reports on abuse of military force were increasing. Impunity on such acts was the norm. The dysfunctional military justice system of the Mexican Army investigated such cases, but this way, no solution could be found. Such cases should be referred right away to the federal justice system to end impunity.
YOLANDA OROZCO, of Action Canada for Population and Development, said that Action Canada for Population and Development was greatly concerned about the need for criminalization of sexual assault in Mexico. During the Universal Periodic Review a number of countries flagged the need for Mexico to harmonize its national legislation with that of international human rights instruments in order to eliminate discriminatory laws and practices and violence against women and girls. Action Canada for Population and Development called on the Human Rights Council to ensure that Mexico implemented these recommendations on the criminalization of such acts and to modify or eliminate laws which were discriminatory in order to ensure that the rights of women and girls were guaranteed.
SARA MENDEZ, of International Commission of Jurists, in a joint statement with Centro de Derechos Humanos Miguel Agustín Pro Juarez, said the legitimate action of human rights defenders as well as social protestors had been criminalised in Mexico. During the Universal Periodic Review process, recommendations referred to the need to combat impunity. There were arbitrary detentions, murders of independent journalists, human rights defenders, and others, which formed a repressive pattern. There was a systematic denial of justice and due process of law used against those who opposed the governing system. The fight against impunity was a major issue.
WANDA NOWICKA, of Federation for Women and Family Planning, said that the Federation appreciated that Mexico had taken and planned to take important steps to promote and protect human rights of all children to freedom from violence, equal opportunities, food, health and education, in particular migrant and indigenous children. The organization also highlighted the importance of comprehensive sexuality education for children and youth. According to Article 26 of the Universal Declaration of Human Rights, education should be directed to the full development of the human personality, and sexuality was an integral aspect of human development. Providing sex education to children and youth was crucial to achieve the Millennium Development Goals, in particular as they related to education and heath and were key to empowering children to protect themselves from sexual abuse.
AGNIESZKA RACZYNSKA TATOMIR, of Groupo de Informacion en reproduccion elegida, said that the organization noted with concern the human rights situation in Mexico and the need for the Government to step up its action plan to address these concerns. With regard to the harmonization of national legislation with that of international human rights instruments, this was vital for the Government of Mexico. Additionally important was the abolition of the practice of “Arraigo”, which was a way of imposing arbitrary detention and had been consistently enforced by members of the army in Mexico. The organization called on Mexico to address these issues with relevant representatives of civil society.
HUMBERTO GUERRERO, of Conectas Direitos Humanos, said there was concern about the recommendation on the re-establishment of a Special Prosecutor's Office or a similar mechanism to investigate the crimes of the past, namely the repression of the civil and political movement, with the deaths of hundreds of people at the hands of the security forces. In five years of work, the Office had carried out only five trials, none of which had resulted in convictions; this was a violation of the right to truth, justice and compensation. This office was eventually closed - despite its shortcomings, it was the only mechanism available for investigation of these issues. The Mexican State should overcome this problem and show a clear will to address the issues and crimes of the past.
LUIS ARRIAGA, of Centro de Derechos Humanos Miguel Augustin Pro Juarez, said that of the recommendations addressed to Mexico in its Universal Periodic Review that remained pending consideration by the State in February of this year, the majority were recommendations that the Government investigate and prosecute cases of alleged human rights violations in civilian jurisdiction, rather than in military jurisdiction as currently occurred in Mexico. The organization emphasized the urgent need for Mexico to comply with these recommendations, as the Government’s current use of military jurisdiction in human rights cases denied victims access to justice and promoted impunity in a climate characterized by an alarming rise in the number of serious human rights violations committed by the country’s soldiers.
RUSALES SIERRA, of Social Service Agency of the Protestant Church in Germany, said that the recommendations made to Mexico during the Universal Periodic Review were solid. It was hoped that the Mexican Government would take measures to implement those recommendations, and that they did not wait for another four years to address them. Violations of the rights of human rights defenders continued to be committed and human rights defenders were victims of threats and persecution. Some human rights defenders had to close their offices and go into hiding due to such threats. The Government of Mexico had not fulfilled its duty to provide protection for human rights defenders nor to prosecute those guilty of such acts. The Social Service Agency of the Protestant Church of Germany called on the Government of Mexico to establish a programme to address this.
LUISA CABAL, of Centre for Reproductive Rights, said there were thousands of women and girls who suffered the consequences of the regressive laws that criminalised abortion under any circumstances in 13 Mexican States. The situation facing women in the various federal entities was not positive and recommendations urged Mexican states to eliminate violence and discrimination against women. Access to justice remained difficult. The Government should ensure that all women could live a life free from justice, and ensure that its commitment to do so was lived up to. Feminicide and impunity were increasing and there should be due investigation of these problems.
ALEJADNRO NEGRIN, General Director for Human Rights and Democracy at the Ministry of Foreign Affairs of Mexico, stressed that the Government of Mexico undertook an extensive mobilization of its institutions in this Universal Periodic Review. This was the case because links with the international system were a crucial factor in the change of Mexico’s system. This Universal Periodic Review process enabled Mexico to develop a broader human rights vision and to focus international aid where it was needed. The exercise was also a tool to promote accountability. Mexico attached great value to the Universal Periodic Review and had accepted most of the recommendations. The international community had contributed to the identification of the central issues on the human rights agenda. Combating impunity and the effective functioning of the justice system was the paradigm for the effective enjoyment of human rights in Mexico. The Government wanted to maintain the flow of information with the international community. Effectively combating inequality and poverty was the second main paradigm in Mexican human rights policy. Combating the scourge of drug trafficking was done with full implementation of the legal and human rights system. Participation of the armed forces was temporary and also done at the request of the civil authority in a specific region. Combating organized crime had meant that working conditions for journalists were worsening daily. Mexico condemned the harassment of journalists and appreciated the recommendations made by NGOs in that regard.
Consideration of Outcome of Universal Periodic Review on Mauritius
SHREE BABOO CHEKITAN SERVANSING, Permanent Representative of Mauritius to the United Nations Office at Geneva, said that Mauritius had always upheld the highest standards of human rights and remained committed to continue to do so. He reiterated that the promotion and protection of human rights, be it at the international, regional or national level, was a priority for Mauritius. In addition to the human rights enshrined in the Constitution, a series of measures had been adopted and they ensured that citizens of Mauritius, irrespective of their race, place of origin, political opinions, colour, creed or sex, were able to exercise effectively their civil, political, economic, social and cultural rights. These measures included the Equal Opportunities Act, the HIV/AIDS Act, the Truth and Justice Commission Act, the Employment Relations Act and the Employment Rights Act, among others. All recommendations put forward during the Universal Periodic Review had been given serious consideration and every effort was being made to implement those that had been accepted.
Mauritius had already started to implement a number of the recommendations. These included the ratification of the Optional Protocol to the Convention on the Rights of the Child on the involvement of children in armed conflict on 12 February 2009. Consultations were ongoing with a view to domesticate the provisions of the Optional Protocol to the Convention on the Rights of the Child on the sale of children, child prostitution and child pornography, and ratifying the Optional Protocol. The Combating of Trafficking in Persons Act was passed on 21 April 2009 and was aimed at not only preventing human trafficking and prosecuting traffickers, but also at providing protection and assistance to victims of trafficking, underscored Mr. Servansing. The eradication of poverty was also high on the agenda of the Government of Mauritius. In this context the Government took measures to strengthen the Eradication of Poverty Programme, by supporting micro enterprises, funding small farmers, breeders and fishermen under the Food Security Fund.
SIM MELLOUH (Algeria) said Algeria noted with satisfaction that Mauritius endorsed most of the recommendations submitted to it, which reflected its commitment to the protection and promotion of human rights. Mauritius' efforts aimed at ensuring the enjoyment of human rights for all its citizens, despite its capacity constraints as a small developing island State, were highly appreciated. Mauritius had adopted a National Plan on Human Rights aiming at developing and raising the awareness of a human rights culture. The positive steps taken by the Government to finalise and implement this Plan were welcomed. The measures taken in order to raise the awareness of police officers of human rights principles were encouraging. The positive steps undertaken by Mauritius to reform its judicial system were appreciated, and the Office of the High Commissioner for Human Rights should provide technical assistance to step up these efforts.
MOHAMED ACHGALOU (Morocco) said that the Universal Periodic Review of Mauritius had showed the commitment of the country to human rights in general and the Universal Periodic Review in particular. Morocco had made a recommendation regarding human rights education which Mauritius had accepted. Morocco commended Mauritius on its efforts in the protection of children, including the ratification of the Optional Protocol to the Convention on the Rights of the Child. Morocco believed that a culture of human rights was an essential element in the promotion of human rights, especially in a rainbow State such as Mauritius, which had a multi-cultural, multi-ethnic and multi-religious society.
ANNA CHAMBERS (United States) said that the United States recognized the commitment of the Government of Mauritius to promote human rights, as evident in its efforts to create a culture of human rights through the establishment of a human rights centre and a national action plan on human rights. Mauritius had also made significant progress in poverty reduction. The United States appreciated the willingness of the Government of Mauritius to continue efforts to promote human rights education, especially for police officers and law enforcement and judicial officials, and to carry out investigations into all violations and death of persons in custody and in prisons attributable to police officers. The United States also supported recommendations documented in the Working Group report regarding discrimination against women, and hoped that Mauritius would finalize and adopt soon the Sexual Offences Bill currently under consideration.
STEFAN KUUSNE (Canada) said the commitments and impressive achievements of Mauritius in the field of human rights since its independence were welcome. Mauritius remained a model of stability and democracy in the region. Mauritius had made significant progress in the field of human rights protection, and this had been reflected in the Economist Intelligence Unit's Index of Democracy 2008, which ranked Mauritius 26th overall of 167 States. Canada encouraged Mauritius to continue its efforts to protect and promote human rights both at home and around the world.
GOPINATHAN ACHAMKULANGARE (India) said that India was encouraged to learn from the report of the Universal Periodic Review that Mauritius had decided to accept a vast majority of the recommendations made during the review process and had responded positively to the others. This testified to Mauritius’ commendable record in the field of the protection and promotion of human rights of its citizens since its independence in 1960 as well as to its policy of cooperation and constructive engagement in the Council. As a country which shared deep historical and cultural ties, India greatly appreciated the fact that Mauritius had further solidified its democratic welfare state credentials with considerable strides made in wide-ranging spheres including poverty eradication, health, education, gender empowerment, child rights and the rights of vulnerable groups.
SHAZRA ABDUL SATTAR (Maldives) said that as a small island State, Mauritius was vulnerable to external economic and environmental shocks and faced important human, financial and technical resource constraints. Despite these challenges, Mauritius had achieved an enormous amount since its independence in 1968, including in the field of human rights. It was party to six of the major international human rights instruments together with related Optional Protocols. Mauritius had been active integrating the principles contained in these treaties into national laws, practices and procedures. The Maldives also commended the establishment of strong independent institutions including a national human rights commission, and an anti-corruption commission. Furthermore, the Maldives took note that Mauritius accepted 44 of the recommendations that were made during the Universal Periodic Review.
ANGUI AWADA (Chad) said Mauritius had accepted most of the recommendations made last February, despite the paucity of financial resources which it had for their implementation. The international community should help Mauritius to overcome these challenges. The report should be adopted.
BOOMETSWE MOKGOTHU (Botswana) said that Mauritius had demonstrated its commitment to the promotion and protection of human rights and Botswana was please to note that the Government of Mauritius had accepted most of the recommendations advanced during the Universal Periodic Review session. This attested to its amiable positive credentials globally. Botswana was most enthused by the continued top-ranking performance of Mauritius in international indices of reviews undertaken by reputable independent organizations on the country’s political, democratic and economic spheres, which no doubt provided the necessary stimulus for the country to be able to effectively meet its obligations to it peoples, as well as at the international level, in the realm of human rights.
IFEANYI NWOSU (Nigeria) said that the Nigerian delegation commended the openness, transparency and commitment with which the Government of Mauritius engaged in the review process. Nigeria noted that the Government of Mauritius accepted almost all the recommendations made to it during the interactive dialogue in February this year including the delegation of Nigeria’s call for efforts to be intensified in the attainment of full enjoyment of civil and political rights as well as economic, social and cultural rights for its population. While wishing the Government of Mauritius well, Nigeria looked forward to greater improvements in its efforts to promote and protect the human rights of its people, come the second cycle of review of Mauritius.
ABDOUL WAHAB HAIDARA (Senegal) said the acceptance of the majority of the recommendations by Mauritius showed the determination of the authorities to work in favour of a true human rights culture, particularly through the completion of the national plan of action for human rights, the purpose of which was in particular to consolidate the human rights of vulnerable groups. Senegal sent its very best wishes to Mauritius for the efforts to continue to improve the human rights situation in the country, especially for women and children.
AMY LAURENSON (New Zealand) said that New Zealand welcomed the constructive and proactive action taken by Mauritius with regard to its Universal Periodic Review. New Zealand recognized that small island developing states faced many challenges and underlined that Mauritius had made great progress. The ratification of the Optional Protocol of the Convention on the Rights of the Child was notable. New Zealand noted that the Government of Mauritius intended to amend legislation that negatively affected the rights of women. New Zealand recognized that Mauritius was considering marital rape under new legislation and recommended that it would be included in the final legislation that was to be adopted. Mauritius had made commendable efforts and New Zealand hoped that it could share its experience.
ROWLAND JIDE MACAULAY, of European Region of the International Lesbian and Gay Association, said that the organization commended Mauritius for its leadership, noted in the Working Group report, in supporting the joint statement on human rights, sexual orientation and gender identity delivered at the United Nations General Assembly last December, on behalf of 67 States from all five United Nations regions. This statement ensured that sexual orientation or gender identity may under no circumstances be the basis for criminal penalties. Mauritius’ acceptance to finalise and adopt the Sexual Offences Bill, which would decriminalize sexual activity between consenting adults, was welcomed, as well as the adoption of the Equal Opportunities Act, which prohibited discrimination on grounds including sexual orientation and HIV status.
ABDEL WAHAB HANI, of Arab Commission of Human Rights, said Mauritius had provided detailed answers this afternoon. The fact that Mauritius had accepted a large number of recommendations was welcomed, but regarding recommendation number three, that the Parliament would receive the Bill on allegations against the police, further information was required, as well as on other recommendations on the situation in prisons, including prison over-crowding and on the tenure of office holders in the Human Rights Council. Mauritius should present a mid-term review of implementation of its recommendations and voluntary commitments to the Council in June 2010.
SHREE BABOO CHEKITAN SERVANSING, Permanent Representative of Mauritius to the United Nations at Geneva, said that Mauritius thanked all speakers for the many expressions of good will and friendship. Mauritius had taken note of all the recommendations made from civil society. The Universal Periodic Review process which was continuous had illustrated that Mauritius was firmly committed to upholding economic, social and cultural rights. The protection of the human rights of women, the disabled and vulnerable groups testified to the unwavering commitment of Mauritius to guaranteeing the enjoyment of human rights. The Government was striving to make Mauritius a human rights island.
For use of the information media; not an official record
HRC09083E